Harrisburg City Council Passes Domestic Registry; Now What?

Harrisburgians may soon be on their way to another notch in the belt of pointless LGBT legislative efforts. 

Harrisburg City Council Unanimously Passes Life Partnership Registry

HARRISBURG- Last night the Harrisburg City Council voted unanimously to adopt an ordinance to create a Life Partnership Registry, allowing unmarried, committed couples to affirm and recognize their relationships with the city. By a vote of 7 to 0, the Harrisburg City Council has taken an important step to streamline the process for domestic partners to obtain healthcare and other benefits afforded to married couples

“This vote shows that people all across Pennsylvania are committed to treating same-sex couples with the same respect and dignity as other married couples,” said Jake Kaskey, policy and outreach coordinator with Equality Advocates Pennsylvania, the state's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender advocacy organization.  “This type of legislation has strong support across Pennsylvania, and will concretely help countless unmarried couples obtain benefits afforded to married couples.” 

Kaskey noted that polling conducted by Susquehanna Polling and Research in November 2007 found that 91% of people polled supported hospital visitation rights for same-sex couples.

Equality Advocates Pennsylvania worked with Councilman Miller and Harrisburg Attorney Benjamin C. Dunlap, Jr. to draft the ordinance.

Councilman Dan Miller, who introduced this legislation, remarked, “I am proud that the Harrisburg City Council unanimously passed the Life Partner Registry Bill last night.  It is a positive step toward equality for all residents.  I hope this new law expanding lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights in the state capital will inspire state legislators to take similar action.”

Lesbian and gay, as well as unmarried heterosexual couples, can register with the city. Harrisburg would become the third municipality in Pennsylvania to approve this type of registry, joining Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.


The ordinance now awaits the approval of Mayor Stephen Reed.

You might recall that Pittsburgh passed similar legislation, signed amidst much fanfare when Luke Ravenstahl came to PrideFest.  Fast forward six months.  Exactly six couples have registered.  There has been no promotion of this resource, either to City employees (60 registered domestic partners in Personnel) or the general public.  There has been no publicized effort to increase the number of employers offering domestic partner benefits.

With all due respect to Jake Kaskey, this legislation hasn't done one single “concrete” thing for Pittsburgh except reinforce the misperception that Luke Ravenstahl supports gay rights.  I have been informed that this is what actually propelled County Councilwoman Amanda Greene to go underground with the gay advocates and come up with the anti-discrimination legislation on the County level.  Certainly, that's a win for County residents.  But what about us here in Pittsburgh who are going to be saddled once again with a Mayor who publicly opposes civil unions, but is willing to allow people to think otherwise so he can court the “pink” voters and donors?  Too bad for us?  Screw us? 

I am poking around for information on how this registry is working in Philadelphia.  Perhaps there is something to be learned from how this rolled out in the Liberty City and I would be ecstatic if this could be salvaged to make a meaningful difference, especially for low and moderate income families who can really utilize the benefits.  And maybe the folks in H-burg have an actual implementation plan to make this a useful resource.

But I'm not exactly “consoled” by the fact that the County Council stepped on my back to achieve equality for gay people.  No one asked me to make that tradeoff and I'd like a recount if they did.  Especially since Amanda Greene is my County Councilwoman and I haven't seen her in Manchester at all (but she's in good company in that regard).  You can bet I'll be contacting her for more discussion on that tradeoff.


We need your help to save the blog.

For 18+ years,  snowflakes, social justice warriors, and the politically correct have built this blog.

Follow us on Twitter @Pghlesbian24 and Instagram @Pghlesbian

We need your ongoing support to maintain this archive and continue the work. Please consider becoming a patron of this blog with a recurring monthly donation or make a one-time donation.       This post and/or others may contain affiliate links. Your purchase through these links support our work. You are under no obligation to make a purchase.

  • I don't get what you want? The city passed the ordinance, it was covered by all the newspaper, television and radio stations, plus bloggers like yourself. So now you're saying the city somehow needs to “promote” signing up? Why? Isn't that the place of the GLBT service organizations and, again, bloggers like your self? Should the city be out promoting fishing licenses too? I just don't get what you want…

  • Dear Anonymous,
    You should reconsider your definition of promotion. It is the venue of public relations entities to promote things. The realm of the media, including bloggers, is to report on news with the occasional opinion. It is self-evident that that the City officials and GLBT organizations involved in this legislation wasted no time “promoting” themselves for this accomplishment. That includes Doug Shields, Bruce Kraus, the Delta Foundation, Steel City, Dana Elfendorf's little group and others. Oh, yes, dear sir or madame, there was lots of promotion going on. Self-promotion and I think you'll see the hypocrisy of crowing about gay accomplishments when those accomplishments don't actually do anything.
    I don't understand this Registry completely, but it doesn't appear to have any real function other than to demonstrate that Ricky Burgess is opposed to gay marriage. How is that helpful, dear anonymous, when nothing concrete comes from isolating him like that?
    As to what Sue wants, let us revisit the definition of media. She, like reporters for the newspaper and other blogs, wants answers about a local gay issue. Her perception is that the legislation is hurting the community. So she is asking questions about it. Why does that trouble you so?
    GLBT Service Organizations probably have enough on their plates without being handed an unfunded mandate by the powers that be. Who is going to promote something that has no meaning or value, kind sir or madame? I encourage you to consider the difference between a for-profit business that sells fishing licenses along with other merchandise on which they can make profit and a not-for-profit organization which is already stretched thin. Is it possible you cannot see the difference? I doubt it, sir or madame anonymous.
    Perhaps, my dear anonymous, you might start a fundraiser so the local organizations can promote this resource?

Comments are closed.