The Death of Justin Jackson: When Will People Learn?

This isn't going to be the post you might expect from me. 

I am tired of watching families wail on television over the loss of a family member due to the police.  I am very sorry for the loss to the family and can completely understand that in their grief, they need to blame someone. 

I blame the media.   For two repeated mistakes.

First, they allow to go unchallenged the perception that the police are supposed to shoot armed suspects “in the leg” or somehow incapacitate them without putting the public and themselves at risk of being shot by a person wounded in the leg, not their arm.  It makes no sense.  It only happens on television.  Maybe we should try to incapacitate John Shumway via his leg and see if he can still shove the microphone into the face of a grieving parent?  Maybe David Highfield should do a very special episode of the KDKA news and actually inform the public about police procedures so they can in turn make informed decisions when walking around with stolen weapons.  Or loving the people who walk around with stolen weapons. 

Second, the police dog is a police officer. It doesn't matter if you think that's stupid.  It is written into state law so there ya go.  Deal with it.  If the dog disabled the person about to shoot you, you'd be pretty darn happy.  It doesn't work both ways.  The media images about police dogs always show them barking to tap right into one of the public's biggest fears — dog bites.  Good job.  Make the public more afraid of the police. 

It just sickens me that there is so little critical thinking happening when the media cover these stories.  They are quick on WPXI to wave Justin Jackson's rap sheet all about as if that somehow warrants his death.  They are equally quick to pick the soundbite of his family's denial that he needed some serious intervention long before he took a stroll down Arlington Avenue. 

All that is missing is the quote from CPRB.  That will hit all the high notes and they'll be on to a new story. 

It is so freakin' reductionist.  Justin Jackson was a messed up kid who came from God knows what kind of background.  His family lost their son.  The police were doing their damn job.  The dog was doing his.  It is a complicated, social nightmare and yet no one seems to talk about it in rational terms — they just want to get the juicy details and point the finger. 

I looked up Justin's record and it is not the record of someone who learned from a mistake.  He certainly didn't learn not to carry a stolen weapon.  Or how to interact with the police and come out alive.  So who failed to teach him that?

The police didn't know his record.  They knew he had a gun and that he was willing to shoot a police officer (yes, a dog — we had this discussion).  He wasn't an 11 year old child running the opposite direction. 

Everyone had choices.  None of them were good. 

This makes me especially sick because of a situation in my own neighborhood one year ago.  A kid similar to Justin — record of drugs and guns — was dealing and causing problems.  Big brother in federal prison.  All four dads in his life had rap sheets. We did all the right things.  Made all the right calls.  Tried to tap into resources like One Vision, One Life  — who should be making a television appearance any minute now — to be repeatedly ignored and misled.  The sad thing is they were really ignoring and lying to this kid.  He didn't matter enough or he wasn't bad enough or violent enough for anyone to take some time to talk with him.  What's more meaningful — a whole contingent of street warriors at a memorial service or one making some time to try and save a kid who wasn't that far gone? 

I'll say right now that the police were far more helpful than One Vision, One Life or our local “safety officer” or our elected officials.  The police did exactly what they promised.  Unlike the rest of them. 

May Justin Jackson rest in peace and may his family find some peace with his death. 

May the rest of us stop getting caught up in a Law & Order dramatic take on police conduct and actually start putting our energies into social programs that prevent and reduce these situations from happening.  May we elect leaders who invest our valuable resources into our valuable children and families.  May we hire administrators that run efficient and effective programs. 

Amen.

**********************************************

This blog proudly built by snowflakes, social justice warriors, and the politically correct. Steel_City_Snowflakes

Join the Steel City Snowflakes with a one time or recurring investment in our projects.  Click the image  to see our current snowflakes.

Follow us on Twitter @Pghlesbian24

This post and/or others may contain affiliate links. Your purchase through these links support our work. You are under no obligation to make a purchase.

  • Sue,
    Wow – low blow to the CPRB. You must have missed my public comment in which I extended our sympathy to the Jackson family, the Bureau and Aulf's handler. As proscribed by law, a formal CPRB investigation will not be initiated until such time as the DA and County police investigations are concluded.
    The CPRB promotes responsible citizenship and respectable law enforcement through mutual accountability. Sorry to disappoint you and others who perpetuate the notion that the CPRB is anti-police….we are not.
    Don't hate the player, hate the game.
    Beth Pittinger

  • her reference to the CPRB didn't seem negative to me, but i can see how it can be seen that way.
    more of “a cherry on top of the media sundae” reference than “in addition, these other idiots could've said something stupid, too,” if you will.

  • This comment is absolutely inane: “Sorry to disappoint you and others who perpetuate the notion that the CPRB is anti-police….we are not.
    Don't hate the player, hate the game.
    Beth Pittinger”
    Foremost, I don't get the impression that's the image Sue is trying to portray regarding the CPRB. And just to play devil's advocate, if she *were*, why would she or anyone be “disappointed?” were she to be proven otherwise? That's a pretty knee-jerk response and I hope you reread the post and rethink your comment. THIS is representative of the mindset of our CPRB?
    On another note, that's some dead-on local news analysis, Sue.
    Personally, I'd like to see Shumway doing a “Pothole Patrol” report after a shot to the groin. Just kidding, Shumway. Just kidding.

  • Are you kidding me? A human being got killed and left out on the cold and one has to apologize? Justified? Give me a break! Wasn't this dog the same that bit an elderly anti-war woman over a year ago and she's still trying to get a hearing? Time to try other police training practices. No justification for killings, try to educate and feed poor neighborhoods, otherwise, the only thing they will learn is crime.

  • Ah, the anonymous anti-war/anti-police comments. How I love 'em. Nothing says conspiracy like the cover of anonymity.
    Are you kidding me? The same dog? Elderly anti-war woman? Is that the best you can do to sow dischord?
    I'm not sure what other police tactics would have worked in this situation, A. Justin surely knew where holding onto that gun was gonna lead. Would it be better if he had shot a human being instead of a dog?
    Social conditions. Absolutely something we have to wrestle with, but where are you comments about the media? Is there any culpability for media vultures that show up to feast on the carcas of the dead child, but were nowhere to be seen during the first 19 years of Justin's life? Or us media consumers who want … even crave… the “breaking news” moment and the never ending shots of reporters coming to us live from the scene 10 hours after the fact?
    The numbers of systems which let this kid and all of down are too numerous to mention.
    Aulf is pretty much the only truly innocent party in the whole situation.

  • and on what specifically do you base that accusation, Anonymous? I welcome an opportunity to discuss it with you: Beth.Pittinger@city.pittsburgh.pa.us (No anonymity here!)
    Responsible citizenship and respectable law enforcement require mutual accountability.
    msmonongahela has a point and I took the advice – yep – I was a little defensive, thanks for the heads-up!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.