Tag Archives: Robert Traynham

Rick Santorum. The Big Sigh.

OMG. I can’t believe Rick Santorum is still relevant … I mean LEADING candidate at this point. What is wrong with America? The man lost his Senate seat by 18 points.

I”m not even sure how to say this. He’s nuts. He’s absolutely beyond the normal crazy and I know crazy. His views are based on fairy tales and myths. He doesn’t have actual policies. He thinks we are stupid enough to think there’s such a thing as “blah people”  or that its an actual justification to explain away his racism. He wants to lock and chain our wombs and superglue aspirin between our knees. I say we, but I’ll probably be rounded up and sent to one of the states that went for Romney to prevent the lesbianation of further women. Until he manages to dismantle public schools, I’m sure vaginal ultrasounds will be mandatory viewing right after the pledge and before morning announcements.  I could go on and on.

Meghan McCain thinks he’s nuts, but she also believes he’ll stand no chance against Obama.

Tony Norman isn’t so sure that people actually see he’s nuts.

So, how did Mr. Santorum make it this far? How is his candidacy even possible in the modern world? Some pundits refer to his “likability” compared to his rivals. What are they talking about? What has he said or done during his surge that paints him in any way as likable?

There’s some Rick Santorum derangement syndrome going around all right, but it’s not affecting me.

Well, I guess I gotta take my lumps and say that the homosexuals who worked for him might deserve what they get. Sure they will be protected, but they have lots of gay friends. Do they really think they can buffer us/them from a Santorum driven Administration? No. And I don’t think they would be protected for very long. I just can’t see a “blah” gay man, even one who took on Tony Norman, fairing well for long among a society being taught to hate him on multiple levels.

Supporting Santorum because he would more easily lose to Obama is not okay.  I used to think it was amusing. Now I’m appalled.

And I’m hiding the aspirin.

 

Please share this content.

Rick Santorum’s Desperate Need for His Gay Communications Director …

When I saw that Rick Santorum’s team has come up with a sweater vest fundraiser to raise a million dollars, I rolled my eyes. I’m not anti-sweater vest, but it is a little … dull?

Then I saw the two mottos of the project

“Don’t let sleeves slow you down.”

“Second Amendment vest: the right to bare arms.”

<not sure if I should groan, sigh or go lie down for a few minutes>

Now Santorum’s voting record on affordable housing and heating assistance programs hasn’t been all bad, but let’s just stop and consider the irony that he’s been promoting the elimination of food stamps while touting a whimsical campaign to go sleeveless in January. In New Hampshire. It probably isn’t funny to people who are wondering how they will pay the heat bill.  Or burying their relative who used a stove to keep themselves warm. Or those in Alaska digging out from 18 feet of snow.

I think it is silliness.

Now here is where ace communications go-to-gay Rob Traynham could actually help Rick create a good message to sell sweaters (see how I work in his actual skill as a communications guy with the tongue-in-cheek reference to gay men being fashionistas?)

I wonder if the PA Cyber Charter School has official sweater vests? You know to raise money to provide scholarships to Senators.

 

Please share this content.

Sue Kerr: “Rick Santorum Never Discussed Gay Sex With Me”

Well, I’m a google search today, thanks to Mr. Santorum. Woo hoo!

Michaelangelo Signorile included this blog in a recent column about Santorum’s hypocrisy on LGBT equality, including a ridiculous defense by former Communication Director Robert Traynham an openly gay man. Apparently, Traynham is fine with Rick’s stance on equality because Rick never criticized ‘gay sex.’ ???

First, how does a communications guy not grasp that there is no such thing as ‘gay sex’ and/or that that is the flimsiest argument ever to support a homophobic elected official? I interned in Rick Santorum’s office in 1991 and I can say affirmatively that then Congressman Santorum never discussed gay sex with me.

Second, Traynham is WRONG! Santorum did discuss sexual orientation (well, at least the queer kind) as being a behavior. Does any reasonable person think a federal amendment banning marriage equality is not a condemnation of sexual conduct?  Really? Santorum wants to dissolve legal marriages that are legal in the eyes of their state. Santorum is very far out there when it comes to any type of equality issue. It is not a big leap to think that he doesn’t want me to have sex with a woman. Really, Robert? That pretty much destroyed any credibility you have to speak on LGBT issues.

I wish I could embed videos, but I’m having WordPress issues so you’ll have to follow the links to see the Hardball interview.

I also learned the Santorum’s eldest daughter (yep, I hung with when she visited her Dad’s office as a little girl) thinks having gay friends somehow offsets the hate rhetoric. I wonder if her “gay friends” include anyone who makes $35,000, can’t get health insurance for her partner and has been verbally abused for wearing something non gender-conforming?  Remember the Bush twins had a gay hair stylist and went to his “commitment ceremony”? Yeah, me too.

What I dread is several more months of Pittsburgh media butchering LGBTQ issues by describing them in terms like “homosexual activists” and “gay sex” (love to see Ken Rice say that) and “transsexuals” and just an abundance of the general ignorance they show when it comes to covering equality issues or stories that happen to involve LGBTQ folks.

Again, please stop outing other Santorum staffers/volunteers in my comments section. I’m not approving them b/c they are not relevant. The point, my LGBTQ friends and allies, is what are you doing to make sure Santorum doesn’t stick around to the PA primary election?

He’s not qualified to be President. Period. His stance on a range of social issues is misinformed and dangerous. I’m far more terrified that he might impact my ability to make decisions about my healthcare than his opinion on my sexual activities, but I’m smart enough to see the slippery slope. I also really want people to have jobs. Seriously.

PS: I have a great photo of Rick and me! I just can’t find it right now. Plus, my blog is broke, but I’ll post on Facebook.

Please share this content.

Whatever Happened to the Gay Guy Who Worked for Santorum?

Robert Traynham. He was Santorum’s PR Director/Communications Director while Santorum was in the Senate. He was an openly gay, African-American man who worked for Rick Santorum. Then he got a fancy job in the D.C. (imagine) and is now teaching at George Mason, hosting a political talk show, making appearances on NPR and other swell stuff. Money will do that. Make you swallow your soul.

If you check out his website, Robert doesn’t mention Santorum. He does mention his affinity for British Royal history. Fortunately, I wrote over 16 blog posts in a two year time span with lots of links.

Ahem.

Here’s Robert’s take on his time in Congress.

“All politicians come to Washington with a set of values and a sense of purpose for what they hope to accomplish as an elected official,” says Traynham.  ”The important question to ask them after a few years [in Washington] is whether they’ve stayed true to those values, or whether their moral compass has somehow changed along the way.  I admire those politicians who stick to their principles, regardless of party, and tend to raise my eyebrow at those who don’t.”

Raise his eyebrow? That’s stern stuff coming from a self-loathing homophobic gay man who turned his back on his entire community, both black and LGBT, to propel Santorum toward the friggin White House. Now, we all know Ricky won’t win, but God knows what else he’s gonna do and how much his gay-hate is going to fuel the people who beat the shit out of gay twentysomethings outside of bars and police officers who arrest transgender people and so forth.

Robert Traynham has made the world a little less safe for the millions of us who aren’t buffered by wealth, access and privilege as him. And he apparently doesn’t give a fuck now because he’s cushy and polished and has a whole new generation of British royals to read about.

If he were a decent person, he’d be speaking out for the LGBT community. He’d be outraged b/c his former boss thinks he should invalidate all same sex marriages.  Robert is referenced as a authoritative “black conservative” on a Tea Party site.

Where is his voice? Oh, here.

Now on the Roll Call with Robert Traynham profile, he lists his “life partner” Brent. Brent appears to be Brent Smith, who is up there on the seniority list at Citi. Hmmm.  Well, we all know how much Citi values average people. To be fair, Citigroup did earn a perfect score on the HRC Equality Index for 2011.

Here’s how Wikipedia sums it up (and you know that’s the truth!)

Personal Life
Traynham is very private about his personal life. He has described himself “as an out gay man”, but rarely does he talk about his love life. He is believed to be partnered to Brent Smith a high ranking official at Citigroup. He has also been rumored to have dated a very well known news official in New York. Traynham is often seen around Washington in the society pages, smoking a pipe in his front yard with the latest political story or at the Palm for lunch.

This reads like a really bad movie script.  His “love life” is private/personal. Apparently, he doesn’t think that applies to me. I’m really curious how a disabled African-American kid growing up in Philly in the 70′s and 80′s turned into this guy? This guy!

In September, he did an op/ed for the PhillyTrib.com website on the “bitter partisan divide.” Guess what analogy he used? Read on:

Sadly, both parties are to blame for this predicament. It reminds me of a bitter marriage dispute where both sides are entwined together because of family, finances and shared history, but the passion, admiration and mutual respect is gone.

Because of this, some broken marriages end up in divorce while others solider on because of unique circumstances that make divorce not an option. In these latter cases, the marriages either end up becoming more of an inconvenient reality, or sometimes both parties go to therapy and work it out and are better partners because of it.

My hope is that, for the sake of our unique history and culture, both political parties take the latter route — work out their differences and put the best interest of the country first. In other words, they go back to what we have always been taught: Treat people the same way in which you would want to be treated.

Really, Robert? Love that you don’t invoke the holy man/woman references, but use gender neutral pronouns to tell us how people repair broken marriages?

HOW WOULD YOU KNOW, GAY MAN? You can’t get married. You HELPED prevent the rest of us from ending up in therapy to save our relationships.  If we were Congress and the President in this analogy, there wouldn’t ever be a presidential speech before Congress because we’d be too busy pretending we were roommates with the British House of Lords and use Lincoln’s bedroom as a front. OK, that wasn’t a great extension of the analogy but you get my drift.

Let’s rewrite that …

Marriage flourishes where there is passion, admiration and mutual respect. When those are gone, people divorce, live in an unhappy marriage or do something to fix it. None of these things has anything to do with gender. Sorry I screwed that one up when I was on my way up the political ladder, but fortunately I have my pipe to give me solace while I contemplate how much I’m being screwed tax wise on my $500,000 home. To be fair, Citi probably screwed more of you than Santorum (ha, pun!) so why don’t you talk with Brent coz I must prepare for the Diamond Jubilee for Queen Elizabeth. She’s done so much for Pennsylvania.

That wasn’t a great rewrite, but I”m annoyed. His ongoing betrayal of the LGBTQ folks without power and access is downright shameful. Being privately gay must be nice.

As a refresher, here’s the post from blogactive.com where Mike Rogers exposed Traynham’s “privately gay” life and vividly captures the reasons why the LGBTQ community should care.

It does matter than rich gay men support Rick Santorum. It should scare the hell out of you, except you probably aren’t that shocked that rich people support fringers who propose to keep their cushy lives a little less infringed upon by the 99%.

Repeat after me. It should scare the hell out of you that rich gay men support … <insert name> (Darryl Metcalfe?)

UPDATE: Please don’t try to “out” someone using my comments section. If you have credible, documented information about anyone connected with Santorum, email me privately and be prepared to be identified. Otherwise, please don’t waste my time.

Please share this content.