Thursday, December 31
by Sue on Thu 31 Dec 2009 11:24 AM EST
No one knows this, but the woman who inspired the character, "Vivian, the Angry Copyreader," on my blog, Ms. Adventures on the Mon, was Chris Biancheria. She worked at The Pitt News copy desk when I was a writer there, back in the late '80s. And she was gay. She had an extremely dry sense of humor, and I'm pretty sure she found me amusing, in all my bubbly blonde, hetereosexual glory. Chris taught me a very valuable lesson about prejudice against the gay community; one I often repeat. She was -- and is -- a very smart woman.
Midnight is better to the 5 AM texts, madam. Ahem. Frannie has also gone from sister blogger to highly valued friend. Her kind words are very humbling. I so appreciate the multiple references in this and other guest posts to human rights. I often focus on the trees and lose sight of that type of forest thinking. I have to go set my alarm for 2 AM to text Frannie a Happy New Year.
by Sue on Thu 31 Dec 2009 08:04 AM EST
I just want to say that I'm pretty amazed at the number of people googling/searching for information on Sgt. Eugene Hlavac, as well as how once they arrive at the site, they tend to poke around a bit. Clearly, people are paying attention to this story and searching for information/opinions -- whether they support him, condemn his actions or haven't come to a conclusion.
I'm basing this on referring keywords that lead people to my site.
Wednesday, December 30
by Sue on Wed 30 Dec 2009 09:27 PM EST
Found this on the Post-Gazette website:
I'm curious what the pro-gay sentiments were. Does this mean the borrower was perceived as gay or perceived as gay-friendly? I'm trying to think what I'd take into my decision-making if someone asked for change for a meter. I doubt I would assess their political beliefs, probably lending $$ to someone sporting an anti-choice button or some such paraphenalia. What about you?
The Daily Courier (part of the Tribune Review family) has a gay-positive story on a local man's second place finish in Mr. Gay USA contest. Kudos to Troy Michael Smith for having a great attitude.
I'm torn on this one. On the one hand, he wants to use his position for good, albeit a naive one. On the other, it is a beauty pageant. Is it realistic that a swimsuit competition will give rise to the next great gay leader? Is it realistic to think there will be one leader anyway? Hmmm.
Bilerico's take on the Top 10 LGBTQ stories of 2009.
I'm not sure I knew there was an openly gay superhero?
Sigh. Charlie Sheen's arrest for domestic violence INCREASED viewership of a rerun of his show.
A little woman-positive shout out: Sarah Thomas made history as the first woman to officiate a bowl game.
Finally, Maria has a very amusing post on the Ravenstahl Inauguration. Who says Luke doesn't support women in Pittsburgh?
by Sue on Wed 30 Dec 2009 01:38 PM EST
Tuesday, December 29
by Sue on Tue 29 Dec 2009 08:30 PM EST
FOP President Dan O'Hara did not just go there. Oh. Yes. He. Did.
Officer O'Hara called the police bureau's decision to even hold a hearing a "miscarriage of justice."
"This should be tried in the courts," said Officer O'Hara. He said the city's decision to act quickly was based on pressure from women's groups. "This was in his private life and has nothing to do with his professional life."
The FOP is actually whining about someone else putting "pressure" on politicians. Excuse me while I ROTFLMAO.
Except. It isn't funny.
Officer O'Hara is supposed to be an advocate for women in their most vulnerable moments. Half of the people he pledges to protect and serve are female. That's a little sobering when you consider he hasn't uttered a single word denouncing domestic abuse.
I understand that he has Hlavac's back to protect, but who is protecting all the rest of us?
I shudder to think of Sgt Hlavac or Officer O'Hara responding to a call involving same sex partner abuse.
by Sue on Tue 29 Dec 2009 07:51 PM EST
I can't remember exactly when I started reading Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondents but it couldn't have been too long after its inception because I had already added it to 2 Political Junkies' blogroll just a little over three months from its birth.
So why did we choose to add a blog that centered on LGBT issues to our very political blogroll on our very political blog?
Well, aside from PLG being an excellent blog overall, aside from it often covering political issues, and aside from being happy to include a blog with a perspective that was other than straight white male, there was the Canary in the Coal Mine consideration. From Wikipedia:
The classic example of animals serving as sentinels is the canary in the coal mine. Well into the 20th century, coal miners in the United Kingdom and the United States brought canaries into coal mines as an early-warning signal for toxic gases including methane and carbon monoxide. The birds, being more sensitive, would become sick before the miners, who would then have a chance to escape or put on protective respirators.
We sometimes hear complaints on Democratic blogs about single issue voters -- why can't the feminists just shut up about abortion when health care reform is at stake? Or, why get all worked up over then candidate Obama including gospel singer and preacher Donnie "Homosexuality is a choice that can be cured" McClurkin for a statewide tour when Obama would so obviously be so much better for gays (and everyone else) than John McCain?
But, I say if you really want to know how progressive a candidate will be -- if you want to know if you can truly trust them (on any issue) -- there's no better way than to find out just how gay friendly they are.
Of course, the pols who are real homophobes are also the ones who seem most likely to be vying for the title of Wingnut of the Year. Here in good ol' PA that would be folks like state Senator John "We allow gays to exist" Eichelberger or state Rep. Daryl "Domestic Violence Awareness Month has a homosexual agenda" Metcalfe.
But the canary test (their stand on LGBT issues) is really most useful when its used on Democrats/Liberals. Take John Edwards. During the presidential primaries he looked pretty good. Great on economic issues with his "Two Americas" meme, but I could never really warm up to the guy and could never really put my finger on why. One thing I knew that made me feel creepy about him was his statement that he was uncomfortable around gays. Not only don't I get that in this day and age, I really didn't get his need to say it. It seems especially grotesque to me now that he had concerns about others' sex lives while he was having his own underground affair. My mistrust in him was validated when it came out that he had the exceedingly bad judgement to think that he could hide an affair while running for the highest office in the land -- a secret that would have imploded any Dem chance of winning in 2008 if he had been the nominee.
President Obama as a ?fierce advocate for gay and lesbian Americans"? If the McClurkin incident didn't tip you off, his picking Prop. 8 proponent Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at his inauguration was telegraphing his lack of urgency in, say, addressing Don't Ask Don't Tell...or in my mind his less than fierce advocacy for, say, getting the the best we could have in Health Care Reform.
Couple a Democratic politician's stand on gay rights with their take on choice for women's reproductive rights and if they're negative on both you may as well stick a big, fat R beside their name because you know that they can't be trusted not to throw someone or something else you care about under the bus. It's just a matter of time...or money.
Or to put it another way, if you can trust someone to look out for the one group left who it's perfectly legal to discriminate against; if you can trust someone to risk condemnation from their own religious leaders on behalf of basic fairness for a group that they aren't a member of, well then, baby, you can trust them to get most things right -- to fight for us all -- immigrant, feminist, environmentalist, atheist, etc., and you get my support.
And, there's no better local blog to find out the real ins and outs of where a politician stands on LGBT issues than Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondents. They're a daily read for me and many others.
Congratulations on four years of blogging and thanks for keeping us all in the loop!
With no irony, I believe that Maria is my hero. I loved her from the moment I stumbled across the junkies. We began an IM chat and soon became friends in real life. She's one of the smartest bloggers in this region and certainly among the most creative. I feel an undeniable twinge of pleasure when she links to a post of mine AND always confident that she has our backs on LGBTQ issues.
by Sue on Tue 29 Dec 2009 07:18 PM EST
It is always exciting to celebrate a bogiversary, and I want to say congratulations to Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondents for all the fine work done! I am humbled by the offer to write a guest blog, and I want to write about a topic, I know is of importance to Sue Kerr and add my spin on it: The need to increase gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and queer voices in the blogosphere.
It shouldn?t be news to anyone that voices of out GLBTQ people are not common in many traditional media, outside of the gay papers and magazines. That has been changing over time, with the inclusion of folks like Rachel Maddow, Ellen Degeneres, and Michaelangelo Signorele, but even as out voices grow, they are still too few and can not represent the vast diversity of the gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and queer communities. In fact, it could be argued (although that isn?t my purpose today) that one reason that so many of us have been so invisible to the mainstream for so long is because there have been enough voices, nor the diversity of voices needed. The blogoshpere offers a solution to that problem, since anyone can begin a blog and share their ideas and opinions quickly and easily.
A blog is, first and foremost, a dialogue between the person writing and those reading and commenting, and dialogue is something we have far too little of, especially given the huge tasks before us when it comes to the struggle for equality. By adding dialogues, or voices to the growing number of dialogues, two things happen. We do a better job of representing the wide diversity of the GLBTQ community more than ever before, and we provide an opportunity for readers to broaden their understandings of the ideas and issues being discussed.
Blogging has a few other real advantages too. For the blogger, it offers a method to refine your ideas and thinking. The more I blog, the more I realize how I feel about issues, and why I feel the way that I do. It prompts me to ask questions and consider alternative ideas and weigh the various sides of an issue, and I leave the process smarter or better informed,, than when I started. It also allows a person to feel heard by others. Too many of us have often felt ignored or silenced, and we are angry about that. Once we have an outlet for our voice, we stop being so angry about being silenced, and we filter those emotions towards creating change. Blogging is also a great way to increase the visibility of the GLBTQ communities. It becomes harder for our opponents and decision makers to ignore us when our voices are louder and more plentiful.
On the other hand, simply adding voices doesn?t in and of itself create change. More and move voices can also simply produce more noise, so it is critical that there is listening, reply, and then thoughtful action. Adding voices is simply the beginning and not the end goal itself.
I?ve heard people claim that they have nothing worth writing about, but in reality, it is precisely these voices and experiences that we need to see out in the blogosphere. Real people, with real ideas, about how they live their daily lives and the issues and ideas that are important to them.
Thomas blogs at http://thomascwaters.com/ covering a range of LGBT issues. We met sometime last spring through mutual advocacy efforts; Thomas is a tireless advocate for the community and has been involved in multiple LGBT projects. His nuanced suggestions for using social media to engage are worth rereading.
by Sue on Tue 29 Dec 2009 07:12 PM EST
Congratulations to the Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondents blog for a trail blazing fourth year anniversary on the Pittsburgh blogosphere! I am humbled and truly honored to provide my perspective on Sue Kerr and her blog's dramatic impact on our community and our continued battle for greater equality.
I promised I wouldn't edit, but I do have to share an amusing tale. My first encounter with Kevin was at the January 10, 2009 LGBT Advocacy Rally . He was in the back of the crowd wearing a long dark coat and looking suspiciously clean cut. We discussed who this guy might be and decided he was probably an operative for the right wing. Then he introduced himself, reminded me he had run for County Council and said he supported gay marriage! I remained skeptical even whilst Kevin showed up again and again. We met for coffee one summer afternoon and had a conversation that really touched my heart in a way that few interactions with politicians have done. We also had a good laugh when I reminded him that I thought he was a spy infiltrating the gay community. Ah ... now I can resume being completely embarrassed at being compared to a civil rights march. I said I wouldn't edit, I said I wouldn't edit.
Monday, December 28
by Sue on Mon 28 Dec 2009 08:30 PM EST
Congratulations to Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondents on four great years of reporting on the LGBT community in and around
I enjoy the blog topics that have to do with our visibility and assimilation into straight culture. They are topics that generate a lot of opinion both for and against.
Visibility is key if we want to achieve the civil rights that we seek. It means being out to your family and co-workers. It means saying ?my partner? or ?my girlfriend/boyfriend? in public. It means not going into hushed tones in a restaurant when talking about certain issues.
That?s hard to do for many people, and I understand. But nobody said this was going to be easy. When you look back on the last two decades and the strides we?ve made (and we have come a long way despite the obstacles we still face), you can point to one over-arching theme that has helped: visibility.
Once we become visible to others, prejudice and bigotry become less of a tool for the opposition. It?s very rare for someone to un-friend someone once they know they?re gay rather than the other way around ? knowing they?re gay before you get to know them. Once friends become allies, half the battle is won.
When people see that we?re in every profession, that we have families just like everyone else, that we pay taxes and mortgages and rent and worry about making ends meet and getting through life like everyone else, there is a sense of normalcy to us.
And that?s the key: we?re normal.
Acceptance leads to partner benefits, marriage, and the rights and responsibilities afforded to everyone else. This has been happening, and it?s led to some unforeseen circumstances. As we become more accepted and integrated, do we lose some of our history? Does the fact that we can now go to ?straight? bars and clubs mean that the exclusively gay places we used to go have to close? Some very historic gay bars have closed recently, both in
I have no answers to these questions, and I guess that time will tell how it all turns out. There is a historical analogy. Looking back at immigrant groups that have come to this country and African Americans who were forced into a segregated society, a pattern eventually emerges. First generations self-segregate into their own neighborhoods because they feel comfortable and safe among their own group. (African Americans never had a choice, and some white European immigrant groups also were forced into segregated neighborhoods in the steel towns around here, but that?s another story).
Subsequent generations become assimilated into the larger culture and leave the old neighborhoods. Where the first generation had their own churches, social clubs and stores, and life revolved around that small circle, the next generation, more educated and mobile, left it all behind. The ethnic churches fell into decline, the social clubs are not what they once were, and the mom and pop stores are gone.
I can?t help but wonder if that?s the progression of gay culture as well. We gain acceptance, but we lose a piece of what made us unique in the first place. Younger people never experienced what it was like to be gay in the 1960s and 70s, just as we don?t personally know what it was like in the 1940s or 50s. Every generation makes its own way and builds on the success of the last generation, and that means that things change. I think we are starting to witness how the next generation is going to build on the progress we?ve made, and I think they?re going to do a great job. Maybe even to the point that in twenty years, being gay will not be an issue at all. And isn?t that the goal?
I have no idea where or when I met George. He's been reading the blog regularly and we bump into one another on a regular basis. He invited us to "live blog" the Celebrate Life, Celebrate Art event in 2009 which was a fun foray into fusing social media with a different kind of advocacy - the arts! We're looking forward to tackling that again in 2010 and always look forward to comments from George. Thank you, George, for being the first to respond.