Pittsburgh's LGBTQ Blog ... out'n proud in the Burghosphere.

Bookmark and Share
Loading
Year Archive
View Article  Preliminary Thoughts on the ACLU Forum

Tonight's event sponsored by the ACLU was very interesting and useful.  The formal topic was "Issues and Answers for the LGBT Commmunity on Law, Marriage, Money and Family Matters."  The 4 panelists are experts in their various fields.  The interesting twist was having each panelist present on their area of law and then send them off to conduct mini-follow up/break out type panels.  This seemed to work much better than a giant question & answer session, plus it created lots of opportunities for socializing and networking. 

I must admit to momentary panic when I realized my Blackberry battery was wearing down (thanks to a toaster plug incident) which meant few tweets, but did actually force me to resort to the good ole pen and paper approach which I have used for the majority of my coverage of local events.

The first panelist was Larry Frankel, State Legislative Counsel for the ACLU.  He provided an overview of the "state of the gay legislative nation" on a federal level.  Larry wants us to know that Pennsylvania does not seem so bad when compared with the rest of the country.  Yes, six states have marriage equality while we don't have a non-discrimination law.  However, 29 states have anti-marriage equality amendments.  That's a useful perspective.

In terms of marriage, Larry emphasized that the battle is moving from the courthouse to the political realm.  The need is to fight for equality at the ballot box in order "to change the hearts and minds of America."  He urged people who think lawsuits are the answer to obtaining rights to work more closely with the somewhat unified national strategy of the existing civil rights organizations. 

Larry's overall premis is that steps toward equality ultimately move us closer to marriage equality. He spoke very movingly about this being a time when so very many issues are on the forefront that it can be overwhelming. 

Next up was Maureen Cohon, an associate with Buchanan Ingersoll and a specialist in Family Issues, including adoption, healthcare, etc.  Maureen brought up an interesting document known as a Domestic Partner Agreement which essentially establishes a contractual relationship between partners.  More than powers of attorney or wills, this outlines the mutual obligations and commitments, even the potential issues of dissolving the relationship. We spoke briefly with one of her partners and she had some very valuable feedback for our particular situation.

Tony Infanti, faculty at the Pitt School of Law, talked about taxes.  What struck me the most was the suggestion that while tax issues are very real (inheritance, etc) they are also very symbolic reflections of what we as a society value.  He delved into some intricacies and I learned that Pennsylvania has a 15% inheritance tax that would impact Ledcat and myself regardless of our civil union/marriage from another state/relationship agreement.  I also learned that Maryland waives this tax for domestic partners.  What a simple, but powerful way to support LGBT families! 

Last up was Sue Frietsche who gave perhaps the best presentation I've heard on HB 300 and the Allegheny County legislation.  She was emphatic about the fact that lobbying works.  She had interesting examples and she pulled the whole thing off without sounding the least bit preachy.  Her reasoning as to the importance of lobbying?  First, there is confusion that needs to be address.  Some legislators just don't know that discrimination based on sexual orientation is legal throughout most of the state.  Second is the mistaken belief that discrimination does not happen.  Sue explained that our legislators need case by case evidence of what is happening to their constituents to trigger their interest and arouse their protective instinct. 

Now, I'm not going to delve too far back into a heated discussion.  I'll simply say that I agree with what Sue had to say.  I need to find new ways to prompt people to take action.  However, I still believe the advocacy folks need to wrestle with some of the issues people have brought to the table and build those personal relationships with people who are expressing that they feel outside of the loop. Denying that the loop exists isn't productive.  Broadening the loop is the key.  Communication.  Open dialogue.  Follow through.  Persuasion. 

This forum was a great start to Pride.  Larry Frankel is a genial, humorous facilitator and we are fortunate he took the time to come to Pittsburgh for this event.  The room had about 75 people, including many folks who you don't usually see about town.  Barb Feige from the Pgh ACLU was everywhere, running video, bringing beverages and generally a flurry of activity to keep things going smoothly.  It was well-organized, appreciated by attendees and drew an array of participants. 

View Article  Marriage Equality March on Washington and other news

Cleve Jones (of Milk fame) is calling for an October 11 March on Washington for Gay Marriage.  Pam's House Blend is not in favor of the idea.  Bil Browning from the Bilerico Project has a list of 10 reasons why this is not a workable idea. 

What are your thoughts?  I'm personally not driving to DC for a 4 hour march on a day when Congress is not in session.  I support pushing for a federal agenda, but this timing is strange.

SCOTUS turned down a challenge to Don't Ask, Don't Tell which means legislative change is the only way to go. 

Someone beat up a gay leader in San Diego for waving a rainbow flag. Ron Deharte is relatively okay and the attacker is in custody.  Here's a partial video:

 

Did you hear this on the radio?

If my son, God forbid, if my son put on a pair of high heels, I would probably hit him with one of my shoes. I would throw a shoe at him. Because you know what? Boys don't wear high heels. And in my house, they definitely don't wear high heels."

 "I look forward to when they go out into society and society beats them down."

Williams and States hurled hateful epithets toward transpeople and especially children throughout the thirty-minute segment, including "freaks," "abnormal," "idiot," and "dumbass."

That's a radio program on KRXQ in Sacramento.  The hosts refuse to apologise. In response to outcries, 10 corporate sponsors have pulled their advertising accounts from the station. 

  • Chipotle
  • Snapple
  • Sonic
  • Bank of America
  • Verizon
  • Carl?s Jr (CKE Restaurants)
  • Wells Fargo
  • Nissan North America
  • AT&T
  • McDonald?s
  • sdf

    View Article  PG Article on PrideFest

    I think it is the rainbow flag that always gets me. Back in 2005 or 2006, the PG ran a beautiful story with a very colorful photo of the rainbow flag as a few children ran underneath it.  That symbol of families and politics and pride merged beautifully.

    Be sure to check out the Post-Gazette's story on Pridefest.  It is fairly positive.  I only have a few quibbles, because they continue to have their history wrong.  I think Pride began downtown, then moved out to Mellon Park and into Shadyside. Ledcat was on the committee and shares that they had a week of activities. I know for a fact that in 2005 when the GLCC sponsored the event, there was an entire month of events which began with the GLSEN Prom and ran through July 1 when a group of queer bicycling grannies came to town.  So this "expansion" myth is a bit disengenuous and makes Pittsburgh seem a bit further behind the curve than we really have been over the past 30 odd years. 

    It would be great for someone to curate a history of Pittsburgh Pride so we could all understand and enjoy the wonderful accomplishments over the years, including the recent expansion.  This wonderful groundswell that has built over 20 years would be something critical to document. 

    There is a ton going on this year so scoot over to www.pittsburghpridespace.com for all the details. 

    The article ends with an important point.

    The main goal of the event, Ms. Buncie said, is to "celebrate all that we are."

    "Most of us define ourselves as 'a part of me is gay, not all of me is gay,' " she said. "It's not just one label that defines you. We all wear many, many hats.

    This sort of fits with my lesbian agenda thread on Facebook this weekend.  :-)  Now I'm going off to the earn a living part of me.

    Kudos to the Pride committee for having an article published.

     

    Follow PghLesbian24 on Twitter

    The Correspondents