Tag Archives: Mark Critz

Overreaction – Western PA Dems and Jim Roddey

Allegheny County GOP Chair and former County Chief Executive Jim Roddey made a horrible decision earlier in the week. He told a joke that mocked people with developmental and intellectual disabilities as part of taking a swipe at Obama supporters. It was offensive, mean-spirited and just plain ugly. It was also out of character for Jim Roddey.

People called him out on it, rightfully so. And he apologized. But his apology was not quite what I hoped for from a man of his credibility b/c he did actually plan the joke – it wasn’t a slip of the tongue. And it was mean. You won’t get any argument from me on that issue.

But within hours of the story breaking, people were up in arms calling for his resignation. They even launched a petition on Change.Org.

What? Talk about an overreaction and talk about being opportunistic. The Dems leading this charge obviously learned nothing from last week’s debacle with Chick-fil-A and the “mayors” calling for illegally banning them from doing business (including Pittsburgh’s own Mayor.)

First, this is not characteristic of Jim Roddey. It does not reflect his true colors or his opinion about people with disabilities. It was a mistake – a hurtful mistake – but Jim Roddey is not a mean spirited nasty Republican who throws ugly soundbytes out to garner headlines. So let’s be a little fair here people and give him a chance to apologize.

Second, Jim Roddey resigning is a TERRIBLE idea for Democrats. He’s not an extremist wingnut and is probably one of the moderating influences on the party that we need. If we are going to unelected Rep Babette Josephs to elect a gay white man, we are not in a position to do anything to remove those who temper State Rep Daryl Metcalfe and his ilk of teapartiers. We NEED moderate or at least not-extremist Republicans in position of authority to ensure some level of bipartisan functionality. Do you really think if he stepped down that the party wouldn’t shift to the right?

Third, Dems keep apologizing for Mark Critz who has openly VOTED against equal rights issues and VOTED for terrible budget measures. So, pot say hello to kettle? Just today Democrat Bill Deweese tried to stay on the ballot. From prison.

Finally, I’m just incredibly annoyed that people missed a huge lesson from Chick-fil-A’s spin on their hate. Instead of a thoughtful response, several elected leaders jumped on the “drive ‘em out of town” bandwagon which put the final stake in the actual message – it became all about supposed free speech violations with no further mention of discrimination.  Our reactivity blew a great opportunity to get an important – critical – message out.

In this situation, we missed a chance to ask Jim Roddey to be the leader we have grown to expect and to take responsibility for hurtful comments that targeted vulnerable people. If we are going to start change.org petitions every time a Republican makes a mistake, we’ll be afloat in tea for decades.

And sadly the people actually hurt by these comments really have had no opportunity to voice their response. They aren’t at the table. Funding for many programs they use has been slashed by Republicans – I wonder if we sat down and had a discussion about which is worse — something making hateful comments or someone cutting funding for your housing — what sort of perspective might we gain?

I’m not giving Jim Roddey a pass on this. His apology was not adequate. But when you set the bar at “resign” less than 12 hours after the offensive behavior, its pretty clear no apology would be adequate.

And here’s my concern – several folks have commented on how “offensive” these comments are to Obama supporters. That sounds a bit too much like people who are offended when someone says they are gay. I’m not offended or outraged that Jim Roddey called me “retarded” at least not on my own behalf. I’m not insulted on my own behalf.

But I’m also not convinced that people are soooo touchy about their support for Obama that being “insulted” by a slur is perceived as a hate attack. There’s no sense of proportionality.

And on behalf of this lesbian, if you are going to rationalize working to elect Mark Critz – a man who has voted against my basic rights and for a terrible devastating budget – you are in no position to call out Jim Roddey on one comment. Again, perspective.

 

Please share this content.

Congressman Mark Critz Rejects LGBT Community. Again.

Mark Critz is reputed to be a nice guy. But he’s no liberal, barely a moderate. So in this neck of the woods that usually means women and gays are screwed.

Last night, freshman Congressman Huelskamp (R – Kansas) offered an amendment to the Commerce-Justice-Science appropriations legislation.  The purpose? “None of the funds made available under this Act, may be used in contravention of the Defense of Marriage Act.”

Huelskamp freely admits this was an attempt to reign in the Department of Justice which has made clear that they will not defend DOMA in court because they believe it is unconstitutional. Huelskamp makes no bones that he did this in response to Vice President Joe Biden’s endorsement of marriage equality.  So basically, this was a vote to reaffirm the existing law known as DOMA. It was also an attempt to control DOJ and take a shot at our families.

So, getting back to Critz.

Mark Critz voted AGAINST repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

Mark Critz voted FOR the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in the fall of 2011.

Mark Critz voted FOR DOMA this week on an amendment where 7 Republicans voted no.

This is not adding up to someone who seems to care a bit about the LGBT community which is very sad because his district has a lot of gays! And they got nothing protecting them except goodwill and … well, the inevitable march of history.

Rather interesting that the 12th district is in lavender ...

 

It is downright frightening.

His opponent, Republica Keith Rothfus, is well also frightening. He’s well-funded (very slick website) and he holds the oft-quoted position on LGBT equality “I believe that the family is the basic building block of society and that the stronger the family, the stronger the society, and the less need for government intrusion into our lives. I will protect the family from threats to redefine it or to undercut its importance. I will vote to protect the institution of marriage as being between one man and one woman.”

See how he does that – the government intrudes in our lives to define marriage so that they don’t have to intrude in our lives. Huh?

So, clearly Rothfus is a wingnut. And apparently its a real tough to call race. But does the damage Rothfus present mean we should still turn a blind eye to Critz SUPPORTING DOMA?  TWICE!

I would argue no. I would argue that his advisors need to give social issues another look-see and determine how he can possibly ever bounce back from this. I would argue that we need to mobilize LGBT folks and allies in his district to call his office NOW and tell him that you are not okay with his vote to support DOMA.

You are the only ones who convince Critz to at least rethink the consequences of his votes for families he represents.

CALL TO ACTION:

1. Call DC and tell Critz’ team that this vote was unacceptable and you want to know what he is doing to protect LGBT persons and families in his district. Insist on an answer (politely.) Phone: (202) 225-2065

2. Email his office (make sure you live in the District).

Here’s the polite but firm question – ask him if any of these three votes will create jobs in District 12?

Don’t wait for him to evolve. He won’t. He’s not the President and his district is not going to become super liberal and he’ll be up for election again in 2 years.

It is not okay for him to so openly deny us our equal rights, our human dignity. He owes us an explanation and we owe it to help him understand that.

sf

Please share this content.

The Rainbow New Year … 2011 LGBTQ in Review

Tons of blog posts in the queersosphere about the highlights of 2011 for the LGBTQ community.

Let’s start with a list from Mara Keisling, Executive Direct of The National Center for Transgender Equality. These are 14 Reasons that Made 2011 Great for Trans People.  The list includes at least 19 municipal/state actions that protect trans people (Pennsylvania is not among the states, but we did see at least 5 PA municipalities pass T inclusive anti-discrimination ordinances. That makes a total of 26 – I believe the most in any state.)

Patrick Hamilton submitted a guest post to Bilerico explaining how the efforts of the religious right inspired him to take concrete action on multiple LGBTQ social justice issues.  Quite a review of transgressions in the name of God. Sigh.

MetroWeekly takes a stab at explaining the complicated legal unfoldings related to Prop 8 and DOMA. The essence is that the Department of Justice has deemed DOMA unconstitutional and refuses to defend it in court. This has had a ripple effect on issues from immigration to health insurance coverage. It also prompted House Republicans to hire their own attorney and reaffirm DOMA. DOMA has been found unconstitutional in 14 courtrooms setting up a hell of a framework for the eventual role of the Supreme Court.

Special Pennsylvania Note: Both Jason Altmire and Mark Critz voted “Yes” to reaffirm DOMA. My support for Altmire is gone based on that unnecessary pandering to the right.  He’s done okay in the past on LGBTQ issues, but the only reason left to support him is that Critz is an even paler representation of a Democrat. Sigh.

Here was a big surprise:

[I]n December, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, a generally conservative court, sided with Vandy Beth Glenn — the trans woman, represented by Lambda Legal, who has testified before Congress about being fired from her job as an editor in the Georgia General Assembly’s Office of Legislative Counsel because she was transgender — in finding that discrimination on the basis of gender non-conformity constitutes sex-based discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.

Pam’s House Blend hasn’t yet posted any “end of year” round-ups, but I’d be remiss if I didn’t point to her ongoing coverage of the on the ground battle to pass a “marriage protection” amendment in North Carolina as a highlight of the power of social media. She’s been relentless pursuing every letter to the editor, every municipal vote, every questionable motive of the amendment supporters.  Her coverage shows the insidious nature of these amendments and adds fuel to the inevitable Supreme Court battle as I mentioned earlier.

Let us not forget Hillary Clinton’s historic speech before the UN declaring equality a human rights issue.

httpv://youtu.be/MudnsExyV78

And … our biggest victory in history … the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” … repealed by Congress in 2010, certified in July 2011 and in effect as of September 20, 2011.

On a local level, things not so good. At least from my point of view.

  • A local lesbian being held up at gunpoint sparked a furious confrontation with the police during a protest. Accounts vary, but it did open a huge can of worms about the alleged gay-bashing by police (much less the “liberal” East End.) The police are in major denial.
  • I learned that the City Firefighters and EMT unions do not offer domestic partner benefits to their members. So much for inclusivity among first responders. This also blows a major hole in the claim that Pittsburgh is “gay-friendly” IMHO.
  • Allegheny County Chief Executive (until Tuesday) Dan Onorato continued his refusal to extend domestic partner benefits to County employees. Ironically, he’s going to work for an insurance company. That’s a little scary, but I think he gets the last laugh on me.
  • Social media went wild with rumors that a local bar booted two women for kissing. A big “kiss-in” was announced. No one showed up. Nothing happened. No one was willing to talk. It was basically a stellar example of apathy and disinformation that only serves to hurt our community.
  • WPXI aired a horrifyingly biased story involving the arrest of two women for prostitution. Their butchery of trans sensitive reporting was appalling to watch.
  • The Advocate reported us (tongue in cheek) as the 5th Gayest City in America. People took it seriously even though the published ‘quantifiers’ were clearly untrue and even referenced a non-existent organization. That was actually pretty amusing. I was among those who fell for it, until I talked with The Advocate publishers.
  • Pennsylvania’s redistricting puts a lot more power in the hands of avidly anti-gay State Representative Darryl Metcalfe (Cranberry) as he manages to make Butler more influential than Erie. Not good.
  • On a bright note, more than six pieces of LGBT positive legislation have been introduced in the General Assembly ranging from Hate Crimes to Bullying.
Certainly, other things happened as well for good and for bad.  We’ll continue to take a look back as well as scan the horizon for signs of whats to come in 2012.

Have a safe and happy New Year celebration.

Please share this content.