Tag Archives: gay bashing

Manager of Bar Where Alleged Queer Bashing Happened Needs to Talk With Police, Not Survivors

This caught my eye in a City Paper blog post about the recent alleged queer bashing at Margaritaville on the South Side.

Emprez and JourDyn's injuries after alleged assault at a Pgh bar over queer identity.

Emprez and JourDyn’s injuries after alleged assault at a Pgh bar over queer identity.

At least one other in the group suffered minor injuries and an employee of the bar was also injured but not hospitalized, according to Brad Rizzo, the bar’s manager, according to PLCB records.

Rizzo says the fight in the bar was unfortunate, and that he believes he knows who the aggressors were. He’s says he’s tried to reach out to those organizing the rally, but has not talked to them yet.

“I do believe I have some information that may help. But no one has returned my calls,” he says.

He says he has taken steps to prevent future incidents, adding extra security and prohibiting beer bottles. Alcohol will be served only in plastic cups now, he says.

“I just hope everyone is OK,” Rizzo says.

Actually, Mr. Rizzo, your bar’s policy is to permanently ban people who were thrown out for fighting so Emprez and JourDyn really can’t drop by for a chat.

But more importantly, Mr. Rizzo has information related to a crime and he’s waiting for the survivors to contact him? What? Why? He should have shared that information with the police immediately. There’s no reason for the survivors to contact him. It isn’t a negotiation or a mediation. A crime took place. Margaritaville has a responsibility to EVERYONE, including LGBTQ patrons, to report what they know.

I also think it is actually a crime itself to withhold information that might solve a crime.

For the record, I am trying to confirm that Mr. Rizzo reached out via telephone to the event organizers. And I did suggest to the victims that they contact the police directly about this latest detail. They agreed.

Let’s hope Mr. Rizzo shows the same common sense.

 

Please share this content.

Spirit Day – Oct 19

This Friday marks Spirit Day- a day when allies wear purple to speak out against bullying and support LGBTQ youth. You can learn more by visiting the Spirit Day page at GLAAD.

Why is this important? Well, today I learned that a young girl in a local school took her life and I have to admit that I immediately wondered if she had been bullied. Any reason for suicide is a tragedy, but I wonder what and how our schools have done in responding to bullying. We just learned that a local elementary school had no library books so my hopes are not high. 

So it is important that allies speak out and speak up – to ensure our youth are safe, especially at their schools.

I have another reason, too. Sometimes adults need allies as well. Certainly, we need you to advocate for equality legislation – to be a voice of fairness at your faith community. But sometimes we need more.

As I’ve shared on this blog, I have experienced two recent incidents of cyberbullying/harassment that were certainly unpleasant. I was tremendously frustrate that Facebook – recipient of an ally award from GLAAD – LinkedIn and FourSquare had such lackluster responses to the incident. I don’t believe any of them take it seriously and it makes me worry about the safety of others – how does a woman who has an abusive ex use LinkedIn to get a job or a promotion? These issues aren’t on their radar.

But what made me the most angry and sad and disappointed was the lack of response of my network. In the incident with LinkedIn, I reached out to about a dozen “1st degree contacts” who were in that group and asked them to say something. I picked people I perceived to be allies.

Only one person said anything. One. None of the others even returned my message. They simply ignored it. And I suspect that they would still consider themselves allies to this day.

That’s when I needed allies. I was scared and this guy was allegedly engaging in escalating hostile conduct. He needed to hear his heterosexual, professional peers refute his message – not necessarily tell him off, but simply say that my being a lesbian was not something I needed to hide on LinkedIn.

In the LGBTQ community, we refer to this as “tone down the gay.”  I’ve heard that a dozen times in my workplace and I’m not exactly stereotypically gay. But what it meant  was

  • don’t talk about your partner – at all – because it makes other people uncomfortable and you might offend their religious beliefs.
  • don’t push so hard for domestic partner benefits
  • don’t use the word lesbian because it might offend a donor
  • don’t be shocked when a supervisor sends you a lesbian porn image
  • don’t claim its a gay emergency** when someone goes through your office and steals your belongings
  • don’t make a big deal with a colleague waves his wrist around as a slur about being gay

I could go on and on and on. But what would be a very short list are the moments when someone stood up for me – and all LGBTQ folks – either in the workplace or on social media or sometimes in public.

For me to say it gets better is a bit fuzzy. Yes, I’m an adult and I can stand up for myself. Sometimes. When a harasser has targeted my home and has a criminal history … hmmm. Could use a little support.

I honestly feel like Joel Hanrahan, Jeff Karstens and Clint Hurdle are stronger allies to me than some of my actual friends. So this week I’m going to let my allies do the talking.

Let’s start with:

Please share this content.

Why is Bob Evans Homophobic?

I know you are probably wondering why I am eating at Bob Evans? Especially when there’s a great Indian place across the street and a Mexican place down the block.

Well, Bob Evans is comfort food. It is somewhere my family went all of the time and somewhere I could feel … safe? I knew exactly what to expect from the prepackaged food. And I wasn’t disappointed except with a really ugly lemon wedge floating in my glass of water as if it had tried to drown itself and failed. Poor thing. I had a really awful day and wanted to feel some sense of comfort.

So Bob Evans has wi-fi which I was happy to use on my phone while I ate. I checked my email, facebooked etc and then I tried to check the stats on a page from my website. Whoa.

“Sonic Wall Block. Site is considered pornography.”

Ahhh …. I’ve been down this road before. Corporations use preset ‘default’ filters to block anti-family sites. Only in the case of LGBTQ sites, they completely screw it up. My site – THIS site – is not pornographic. I run no ads, I rarely curse and and its not particularly adult in terms of sex chat. But it does have the big LESBIAN in the middle of the page name.

When I encounter these situations, I run a few checks.

  1. Does website for Hooters load? Yes.
  2. Does website for at least 3 other LGBT sites NOT named LGBT load? Yes.
  3. Does a to remain unnamed actual porn site load? Yes

So check. Now I’ll contact Bob Evans and complain. This is prejudice because it assumes that the word lesbian is pornographic. Yes, I know the filters were set by someone else but it doesn’t take a corporate diversity genius to realize its an issue to add to the category of “respect our customers.”

Its also ineffective. Would you rather your 15 year old using her phone to browse while you drink your 18th coffee refill take a look at the Hooters website or mine? Would you be okay if the “LGBT” site has adult language, discussions of sex and lots of photos but doesn’t have the “name” BIG GAY WEBSITE?

Of course not. And Bob Evans isn’t really concerned about your child either or they would go to the trouble to set the blocking tools to block content, not words. Lesbian is not a dirty word. It doesn’t represent evil pornography. It simply is a shorthand method to maintain a “family friendly” atmosphere without doing the heavy lifting.

And, by the way, lesbians eat at Bob Evans. I can name a half dozen off the top of my head. Soooo…. maybe we should start tipping based on being considered porn addicts?

So here’s what’s probably going to happen. Someone from Bob Evans will reach out to me and explain all of this that I already know. They MIGHT open my one particular site because I complained. But they won’t change their system because frankly – they don’t really care. One “oh my” from a horrified good Christian beyotche on a Sunday brunch is far more powerful than our entire community.

Bob Evans scored a 15 on the HRC Equality Index. They get those points for including sexual orientation in their non-discrimination policy. That was their only score. And to be fair, I’ve never experienced discrimination at Bob Evans when I’ve been in full out lesbian mode – you know, with my partner ordering eggs and such.

But … even if Bob Evans opens my site because I complain, they aren’t going to get to the heart of the problem and they aren’t going to challenge the tech-assumption that the word LESBIAN is well, pornographic. Its a stupid, ill-informed, inaccurate assumption. But it sends a signal that they will happily take our dollars without spitting in our food, but not use the L-word.

Rest assured, this is not limited to Bob Evans. Panera does it. Even Facebook does it – it took the intervention of GLAAD to get them to allow me to “name” my blog’s page Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondent. Apparently, they make an exception for “gay” because its also a popular surname. Damn gays and their legitimizing ties. :-)  But seriously … Facebook is supposed to be homofriendly and yet they simply won’t address this.

I’m sure it has a lot to with money. I’m sure its expensive to reprogram your entire sonic wall/filter system to be effective in preventing access to actual pornography. But note to Bob Evans – I got through just fine to multiple LGBT websites filled with ads for gay dating sites that feature men in skimpy swimsuits KISSING.  Because I knew the URLs. None of those sites are porn either. They are hard hitting news sites that run ads tailored to the LGBT community. And Hooters!

So if you feel inclined, contact Bob Evans by emailand ask them to reevaluate the effectiveness of their “sonic wall” and the real message they are sending to us customers, gay and straight. You can also tweet them @BobEvansFarms

In the meantime, we as a community need to put pressure on the HRC and others to consider this standard practice as an indicator of LGBT cultural competency.  I have dozens of stories of people being blocked and they all involve big companies. The ability to fine tune filters does exist. Its just not going to be a priority until someone draws attention to the issue. And that person shouldn’t have to be the employee — I had several incidents where I went to my IT team to get legitimate access to sites FOR WORK and had to explain. That was so annoying. I would politely send the request with a cc to my boss (who trusted me) and I would still get push back.  The suspicion was unnecessary. My boss was clearly aware of my request.  Duh!

It creates problems. If you are a gay employee and want to look at an appropriate news site JUST LIKE OTHER PEOPLE LOOK AT CNN, are you going to feel comfortable asking for permission?  And if you are already having some qualms about being perceived as gay, are you going to be okay asking for access to a site – even for a work related purpose? NO.

My favorite story is when a friend who is a partner in a lawfirm couldn’t get to my site. He went to IT and they asked him to explain WHY. His response “None of your fucking business.”

He is, after all, a partner. The site was opened.

Blocking our sites reduces access to important information. My blog is filled with critical facts on news, media, politics, cultural and so forth topics. I would think it looks GOOD for Pittsburgh to be home to a site that tackles these topics. Yes, I”m fine that my site might have mature content because I talk about some heavy duty issues. I KNOW THAT. But its not pornography.

And to suggest otherwise is simply offensive.

(Irony – if Bob Evans officials actually take time to investigate, they can’t read this! ha!)

Please share this content.

Trayvon Martin and This Lesbian Perspective

Like you, I was horrified to learn about the death  murder of Trayvon Martin at the hands of a man who was way over the top in his zeal to be a quasi law enforcement officer, a zeal infused with racist attitudes that led to the death of a young man doing nothing wrong.

I think the law in Florida – and a similar law in Pennsylvania – is a terrible way to protect the community. In my opinion, that law fueled Zimmerman’s decision to pursue Trayvon which mitigates the claim of “self-defense” but it remains to be seen what the justice system will do.

A few months ago, the 17-year-old boy across the street who happens to be African-American was engaging in pranks with some young friends. They rang a neighbor’s doorbell and ran. They did it to us and I went outside to confront them. So did the neighbor. In the midst of a heated discussion with “S’s” grandmother, the neighbor – also African-American – revealed that he has a handgun and might have been tempted to answer the door with the gun to protect his family.

He was actually sharing that in a very calm manner, seemingly to teach S that his actions could have consequences.  S’s story is not atypical of young black teens in our community – raised by grandma who is often not home (she works and apparently sits with her other grandchildren), he’s sort of adrift. He’s a nice enough kid who shovels walks for cash, but also tries to pull off some ridiculous scams. A few neighbors take an interest in him, but then he engages in negative behavior – he and his friends sat at the end of the street calling Ledcat and me “dykes” in stage whispers. We laughed and went on our way.

But he also has done some somewhat numskull stunts, like trying to set our fence on fire. Ledcat swiftly dealt with that, but he didn’t seem to care or register that our fence is connected to four properties with a senior citizen and young children whose lives would be at risk.  I suspect grandma whipped him, but her not being around is the larger issue. We watch somewhat sadly as he meanders through his senior year in high school and simply wonder. I’ve called our local street outreach team to talk with him about his choice of associates, but I have no idea what happened.

My point is that he does some immature stuff and its likely he’ll do it again. We don’t have a gun, but our neighbor does and under the law – he could answer the door with it pointed at the head of S. I simply don’t answer the door. Is S a threat to this man’s family? Well, how can I answer that? I’m not sure what’s going on with him, but I also know he hangs with some ne’redowells so I can seem him being persuaded into doing something stupid. I really can. I don’t think that justifies him being shot.

I wonder why our neighbor said that in response to a simple prank? Was he speaking mano-el-mano to S? Was he issuing a threat I didn’t pick up? Is he involved in something he wants to protect? Our block is pretty crime free, especially since the drug dealers down the street both landed in prison and their mother moved away.

I don’t often base my responses to S on the fact that he is a black youth, but I am conscious of it and I worry for him because I see the paths other kids in our neighborhood take. I also worry when he’s sitting on his grandma’s steps wearing a hoodie and waiting to be let into the house (no clue why he doesn’t have a key.) And I wonder if I could be more involved. But the folks at the street outreach team told me not to invite him into our home because of his associates. They know better than I do. So I go out and talk with him and let him use my cell phone to call grandma. But I worry the police will harass him simply for being there. So I watch, ready to intervene. But I can’t watch all of the time and neither can I convince his grandma its an issue.

I wasn’t pleased that S and his buddies used slurs to mock us, but it was an isolated incident. I truly think boredom and lack of opportunity drive his decision-making. But I can also see that other women might take his comments more seriously – would they be justified in answering the door with a gun when he shows up with a shovel?

The implications for these laws are frightening. IMHO, the answer is no. Don’t answer the door. Look out the window. Call the police. If you are uncomfortable, those are reasonable responses. But the idea that our neighbor would pull a gun on someone he actually knows is a little troubling.

Saturday evening, NBC nightly news did some interviews in Trayvon’s hometown. It was sad until they interviewed a woman who appeared to be at an outdoor produce market. She shook her head and made some comments about the whole community being perceived as racist. Then she said it:

“I feel bad for the family, but enough is enough,” she said with regard to the protests. She was fed up with being portrayed as a racist.

It had been 34 days since Trayvon was murdered. How could enough of anything be enough? Grief? Anger? Sadness? Frustration with the legal system? With media coverage? Would she have said the same about the families in the wake of 9/11? Or the public response to the trial of Casey Anthony?

No, she would not. Trayvon was as innocent as Caylee Anthony and the victims of 9/11. He wasn’t doing anything illegal.  He posed no threat to Zimmerman. He was walking while being black. That’s his crime and its a crime the echoes around the nation. The heartlessness of saying “enough is enough” in terms of  public outrage is stunning, but not surprising. It’s what many people think. They search for reasons to portray a 17 year old as a threat. Possession of a marijuana baggie does not make someone a threat, especially when that was a separate incident. Facebook photos that mimic the immature antics of millions of boys around the country do not make someone a threat.

I’m waiting for NBC to post the clip so I can make sure I caught her quote accurately, but Ledcat and I both saw it.

The lesbian perspective? Well, it’s not the same to be guilty of being lesbian in public, but it isn’t easy. Gay bashing is often treated with similar disregard until public pressure and white privilege kick in to place. Bashing of transpersons of color are often completely overlooked.

It is time that the justice system took all crimes – no matter the victim – more seriously.  It is time that we all did. Women don’t deserve to be assaulted because they wear certain clothing. Black young men don’t deserve to be detained and arrested because they are black. Gay men aren’t asking a beating because they threaten someone’s masculinity by simply being gay.

Its time that the whole community started to listen of the voices who endure these experiences and search for solutions, instead of crouching in a defensive posture of denial of our privilege. I know that the problem is the way racism is so deeply embedded in our culture that we remain blind to it, sometimes because we fear losing what we’ve gained?

It’s never enough when parents  lose a child. How dare we suggest that there’s a time limit on grief? I get that the woman in Florida might be frustrated, but that pales in comparison and if she’s clueless enough to make such callous remarks on national television, my empathy for any discomfort she experiences evaporates. Deal with it, lady.

So these are some meandering thoughts. I’m going to donate to the effort to change the law in Pennsylvania. I’m going to rethink the way I engage S and continue to push for someone to respond. I’m going to continue the intense discussions Ledcat and I have had about the impact racism has had on our lives. I’m not sure where this will lead, but I do know that enough is not enough.

 

Please share this content.