Here's the link to the usual transphobic stupidity, although this headline is pretty awful.
First-graders should not be forced into the classrooms of teachers undergoing sex changes. Religious broadcasters and faith-based summer camps should not be forced to hire cross-dressers. Women should not be forced to share bathrooms with people with male body parts who say they want to be females. Yet those are some of the likely results if Congress passes H.R. 3017, the so-called Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which is due for a vote this week by the House Education and Labor Committee.
Do you see the theme … transpeople are “weirdos” and ENDA is going to protect their dysfunctional identity, rather than simply protect our community's right to our jobs. When the media (such as this past week's episode of Accidentally on Purpose) are saturated with caricatures of the stereotypical crossdressing man (ugly man in dress) for the cheap laugh — people laugh, but they also clutch their children a little closer because they continue to wallow in fear and misunderstanding.
Similar problems abound in this bill, which treats a conscious decision to choose a new or different sexual identity as if it were an inherent, unavoidable condition. But it's not. It's actually a psychological disorder, officially listed as such by the current American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Our children and our co-workers should not be forced by law to be held hostage to such disorders, nor should employers be forced to have psychologically troubled persons as the public face of their businesses.
Yes, Gender Identity Disorder is still classified in the DSM, including the soon to be published version 5. However, there are very good reasons for this based on meeting the psychological needs of individuals. A very good explanation can be found at the Transgender Workplace Diversity blog.
Those of us who have transgender friends, acquaintances, coworkers and neighbors recognize this as a distraction tactic to get the focus off the economic development aspect of the legislation by tapping into the “bathroom/dressing room” fears of those who do not know any better. This galvanizes them to advocacy and backs down the legislators wavering on a “jobs” bill. Sigh.
Are you disgusted/angered/disappointed? A few things you can do.
Call or email Jason Altmire's staff person TODAY. Politely ask him to support the legislation – inclusive ENDA. You can email at this link. Ideally, use your free cell phone long distance to call at 202-225-2565
Bloggers and media can contact Tess Mullen can be reached at 202-225-2565 and firstname.lastname@example.org It would be appropriate to mention the Washington Times article to Tess and explain why we need positive support in the media from our elected officials.
Politely remind Congressman Altmire that workplace protections in Pittsburgh and Erie have not generated any of these situations. It is fear based ammunition not grounded in fact. His district is buffered by these protections so he knows this as do his constituents. This is not risky. This *is* essential for our community.
Remember, Jason has been an ally. He voted for ENDA in 2007. He voted for Hate Crimes Protections in 2009. He's attended LGBTQ events, even before running for office. Yes, there's health care which even more reason we should invite him back to the equal rights table.
Updated: Regarding the Washington Times, Editorial Page Editor Brett Decker, Tel: 202/636-4814; Fax: 202/715-0037, or submit a letter to the editor: email@example.com.