I must say that Utah and the Mormons are a very interesting lot. This from the Post-Gazette:
State Rep. Christine Johnson will serve an additional role when the Utah Legislature convenes this month. The lesbian lawmaker announced she's a surrogate mother, carrying a baby for two gay men.
Ms. Johnson, D-Salt Lake City, said she decided to become artificially impregnated with sperm from one of the men after the two close friends expressed frustration over the difficulty of adopting a child.
Utah law prohibits unmarried couples from adopting and does not recognize gay marriage.
Ms. Johnson, 41, who has a 17-year-old daughter from a two-year marriage, is four months pregnant and expecting on June 21.
Now, that's an interesting public stance for an elected official … pretty gutsy to take on what might be perceived as a controversial step in your personal life while serving in office. According to the story, however, her colleagues aren't responding with the xtian outrage one might expect.
Sen. Howard Stephenson, R-Draper, said he thinks having both a mother and father in the home “is the optimum, and what every baby deserves.”
________________________________________________________________________________________ >
For 18+ years, snowflakes, social justice warriors, and the politically correct have built this blog. Help us keep this content free and accessible with a recurring or one-time donation.
GoFundMe ** Venmo ** Paypal ** CashApp ** Patreon
Each donation creates a digital snowflake vis a vis Steel City Snowflakes _______________________________________________________________________________________________
But he added: “I do respect any woman who will carry and bear a child for a childless couple … It's my responsibility to show respect and love for one of God's daughters.”
House Speaker David Clark, R-Santa Clara, also a Mormon, agrees. “At the end of the day, it's the gift of life” that is important, he said.
Interesting. Does this mean state law, which essentially forbids LGBT persons from adopting, is the “optimum” standard? I'm not sure that is the role of law — to set the bar high, especially when it denies children families that meet all the criteria for health, welfare, safety and love with the exception of marriage.
While I'm glad her colleagues across the aisle are respectful, it is actually sad that a couple who wished to provide a home for an existing child, must instead bring a new life into the world because of state adoption laws. I think Speaker Clark's sentiments might ring a little more true if “the gift of life” extended to children who are waiting to be adopted as well as the uborn fetus.
However, Representative Johnson appears to be unabashed about her belief that her gay male friends will be good parents and willing to put her own life on hold (and risk her career) to support them. That's quite laudable. Perhaps her access to the lawmaking realm with educate her colleagues and help them address the legal ban on adoptions.
For the record, second parent adoptions are legal in Pennsylvania.
Like this:
Like Loading...
